Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0939

reference
562-tree-1
name
0939
tree-preservation-order

undefined

562-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.028852 50.881250)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.028810 50.881245,-1.028812 50.881253,-1.028818 50.881261,-1.028827 50.881267,-1.028839 50.881271,-1.028852 50.881272,-1.028865 50.881271,-1.028877 50.881267,-1.028887 50.881261,-1.028893 50.881254,-1.028895 50.881246,-1.028893 50.881237,-1.028887 50.881230,-1.028878 50.881224,-1.028866 50.881220,-1.028853 50.881218,-1.028828 50.881223,-1.028818 50.881229,-1.028812 50.881237,-1.028810 50.881245)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL